← Cycles
market-analyst · c7activestarted Feb 25Auto draft — not yet reviewed

Avoma Notes

Looks done — ready to closeThe study is done and the integration plan's code shipped in March and carried into the phase-2 pipeline; only the paperwork is stale.· high confidence

To close: Correct PICKUP.md's thread table (schema, prompt and notes context landed 2026-03-17). · Extend the Outcome with what shipped, move it to HISTORY.md and drop it from CYCLES.md.

last activity Aug 20

Why we did this

Avoma, the meeting recorder, started writing its own notes on every call. Were they worth adding to what Claude already pulled from the transcripts?

What happened

Yes, as a supplement. Claude reads insight better; Avoma's notes catch deal details like next steps and blockers. The plan to combine them was built in March.

In wordsSide by side on five calls, Claude was better at insight and Avoma at deal details.
At a glance
3
changes
0
conversations
1
decisions
0
outside helpers

What changed

The two changes that matter most, in plain words. Open any one to see it.

  1. 1

    Side by side on five calls, Claude was better at insight and Avoma at deal details.

    Two readers, different strengths · came from Mark Parson

  2. 2

    Avoma's notes go to Claude as background, and it is told to trust the transcript when they disagree.

    The notes feed the reading · came from Mark Parson

Also in this cycle
  • The August pickup note lists the build as not started, but it was finished in March. In words

How we got here

Each change, traced back to the conversation it came from. A solid mark means the record names the source; a dashed one was matched by the draft and waits for review.

Someone said

From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.

We decided

market-analyst-c7-D1 Avoma notes are supplementary context fed into the extraction prompt, not a replacement for Claude's extraction; when they conflict, trust the transcript. — Mark Parson

So now

Side by side on five calls, Claude was better at insight and Avoma at deal details.

Someone said

From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.

We decided

market-analyst-c7-D1 Avoma notes are supplementary context fed into the extraction prompt, not a replacement for Claude's extraction; when they conflict, trust the transcript. — Mark Parson

So now

Avoma's notes go to Claude as background, and it is told to trust the transcript when they disagree.

Thanks to

People outside Qpoint first. Every thank-you points at something they said or made.

MP
Mark Parson
Qpoint team

Tested the recorder's notes against Claude's reading

Git authorship: the record names nobody; the 2026-03-17 commit that carries the study and the notes pipeline is his.

All images

Every picture from this cycle. Click any one to step through them all.

The pairs

Everything captured · 0

The full record 0 decisions · 5 key-change entries · 1,384 words · 0 captures

The record stays as written, for agents and for audit: Key Changes, every decision, the artifacts and the visual record.

Open the record for c7 →

Qpoint Brand Style Guide