← Cycles
market-analyst · c5archivedstarted Feb 24Auto draft — not yet reviewed

Analysis Agent

Why we did this

The batch analysis gave a fixed report. With 19 calls in, the team wanted to ask its own questions and get answers backed by the calls.

What happened

A chat command now answers questions about the calls, citing the company, the date and the customer's own words. Its first test sized up one prospect's interest.

In wordsA command answers questions about the calls with the call, date and exact words behind each claim.
At a glance
2
changes
0
conversations
0
decisions
0
outside helpers

What changed

The change that matters most, in plain words. Open any one to see it.

  1. 1

    A command answers questions about the calls with the call, date and exact words behind each claim.

    Ask the calls a question · came from Mark Parson

Also in this cycle
  • A goals file lists the questions Qpoint wants the calls to answer. In words

How we got here

Each change, traced back to the conversation it came from. A solid mark means the record names the source; a dashed one was matched by the draft and waits for review.

Someone said

From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.

We decided

No ruling needed: the work itself is the change.

So now

A command answers questions about the calls with the call, date and exact words behind each claim.

Thanks to

People outside Qpoint first. Every thank-you points at something they said or made.

MP
Mark Parson
Qpoint team

Made the calls something you can question

Git authorship: the record names nobody; the commits carrying this work are his.

All images

Every picture from this cycle. Click any one to step through them all.

The pairs

Everything captured · 0

The full record 0 decisions · 3 key-change entries · 199 words · 0 captures

The record stays as written, for agents and for audit: Key Changes, every decision, the artifacts and the visual record.

Open the record for c5 →

Qpoint Brand Style Guide