Conversation Profiles
To close: Write the Outcome. · Move it to HISTORY.md and drop it from CYCLES.md.
last activity Sep 3
The tool read advisors' and teammates' enthusiasm as customer proof. In one call, 12 of 21 findings came from Qpoint's own people.
Each call now declares who is talking and why, every finding says whose view it is, and code decides what counts as proof. By that rule, none of seven use cases is proven yet.
Documents
With file names, on their own page →Start here
What changed
The two changes that matter most, in plain words. Open any one to see it.
- 1
Each finding is tagged as first-hand, passed along, or from inside Qpoint, and anything a Qpoint person says counts as inside.
Every finding says whose view it is · came from Mark Parson
- 2
A use case counts as proven only when two outside companies back it from real use, in their own words.
Proof is computed, not felt · came from Mark Peterson and Mark Parson
- Before a call is read, it's labelled by who the other side is and what kind of meeting it was. In words
- Team and advisor sessions now record their decisions, to-dos and parked ideas. In words
- A brief template requires its sources, and the path from conversation to shipped design is written down. In words
How we got here
Each change, traced back to the conversation it came from. A solid mark means the record names the source; a dashed one was matched by the draft and waits for review.
From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.
market-analyst-c11-D2 Be explicit about the nature of each meeting, but keep it simple: small concessions only where they yield the truest analysis. — Mark Parson
Each finding is tagged as first-hand, passed along, or from inside Qpoint, and anything a Qpoint person says counts as inside.
“Our CFO in terms of, like, you know, tokens cost, like, she's trying to rationalize spend all the time, and actually, cost is attributed to department... it's like, in any way that that if that's represented, that that's a good insight.”
market-analyst /calls/09ecfede… (local)market-analyst-c11-D1 Mark Peterson stays ciso-advisory; perspective tagging and a declared call type keep his conviction from reading as customer validation. — Mark Parson
A use case counts as proven only when two outside companies back it from real use, in their own words.
Thanks to
People outside Qpoint first. Every thank-you points at something they said or made.
His CFO's question was advisor evidence the new rules let through
Cited: the record says his Sep 3 ask for AI spend broken down by department, driven by his CFO, landed as first-hand evidence, while the team's own claims in the same call were capped. His Aug 31 and Sep 3 calls were also the test cases the profiles were built on.
“Our CFO in terms of, like, you know, tokens cost, like, she's trying to rationalize spend all the time, and actually, cost is attributed to department... it's like, in any way that that if that's represented, that that's a good insight.” first-hand
Asked to be explicit about the meeting, and to keep it simple
Cited: his five messages in the initial prompt set the cycle (treat these as team meetings, don't mistake a teammate's view for the customer's, be explicit about the nature of the meeting, small concessions only), and he ruled Mark Peterson stays an advisor.
All images
Every picture from this cycle. Click any one to step through them all.
The pairs
Everything captured · 0
The full record 1 decisions · 5 key-change entries · 1,605 words · 0 captures
The record stays as written, for agents and for audit: Key Changes, every decision, the artifacts and the visual record.
Open the record for c11 →