← Cycles
design · c55activestarted Jul 24Auto draft — not yet reviewed

Agent Market Definition

Taken over by later cycles — closePersona work moved to market-analyst (personas.json was seeded from c55, plus the problems registry), and the product focus has since moved to AI governance (c120).· medium confidence

To close: Write an Outcome: page-persona analysis delivered, done-bar not met, carried by market-analyst · Copy the four open questions to market-analyst · Move to HISTORY.md

last activity Aug 6

Why we did this

The dashboard had grown by following the technology. We didn't yet know who it was for, and there were no customer calls to ask.

What happened

Reading every page against eleven kinds of buyer showed it fit a hands-on security engineer best. Those guesses now live in market-analyst, and calls have since confirmed most.

In wordsAs built, the product serves a mid-size company's security engineer best: the only person with a full find, sort out, decide and prove loop.
At a glance

What changed

The three changes that matter most, in plain words. Open any one to see it.

  1. 1

    As built, the product serves a mid-size company's security engineer best: the only person with a full find, sort out, decide and prove loop.

    Built for a hands-on security engineer · came from Mark Parson

  2. 2

    Showing a company what AI tools are actually running works for every size of company, needs no new habits, and leads into the rest.

    A simple way in: show what AI is running

  3. 3

    market-analyst's persona list was seeded from this cycle's eleven people; most are now marked as seen on real calls.

    The guesses became the shared persona list · came from Mark Peterson

Also in this cycle
  • The cycle ended on four questions; the biggest, who the buyer is, was asked again by a CISO a month later. In words

How we got here

Each change, traced back to the conversation it came from. A solid mark means the record names the source; a dashed one was matched by the draft and waits for review.

Someone said

From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.

We decided

No ruling needed: the work itself is the change.

So now

As built, the product serves a mid-size company's security engineer best: the only person with a full find, sort out, decide and prove loop.

Someone said

From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.

We decided

No ruling needed: the work itself is the change.

So now

Showing a company what AI tools are actually running works for every size of company, needs no new habits, and leads into the rest.

Someone said
MPMark PetersonAug 20matched · review

“there's gotta be at least 3 personas here. Is it the, like, the GRC slash, like, security compliance person?... then there's the IT ops person... and then you've got the... end users or engineers”

market-analyst /calls/2100ac03… (local)
We decided

No ruling needed: the work itself is the change.

So now

market-analyst's persona list was seeded from this cycle's eleven people; most are now marked as seen on real calls.

Thanks to

People outside Qpoint first. Every thank-you points at something they said or made.

CE
Cam Esdaile
Build partner · Cisco

His Cisco directives were the brief to check against

Cited: the record lists "Cam's dashboard directives" as an input, a security-exec-first view from Cisco. Reconciling c55's personas with them was left as the next step and is not recorded as done.

MP
Mark Peterson
Advisor · Moto

Named the persona c55 missed

Matched: on the Aug 20 product review he said there have to be at least three personas, GRC, IT ops and the engineers themselves. market-analyst added the end user as P12, "a gap in c55".

“there's gotta be at least 3 personas here. Is it the, like, the GRC slash, like, security compliance person?... then there's the IT ops person... and then you've got the... end users or engineers” first-hand
SC
Samuel Curry
Prospect · Zscaler

Asked c55's open question from the buyer's side

Matched: on the Aug 20 Zscaler demo he asked whether security, the CIO or ops would run and buy it, the same question c55 left open.

“Who's gonna run it on the backend? Is it my team? Is it the CIO? Is this actually a CIO purchase?” first-hand
MP
Mark Parson
Qpoint team

Asked for it hypothesis-first

Started the work by asking for the pages to be read against general personas before any calls existed, to be checked later.

All images

Every picture from this cycle. Click any one to step through them all.

The pairs

Everything captured · 0

The full record 0 decisions · 2 key-change entries · 389 words · 0 captures

The record stays as written, for agents and for audit: Key Changes, every decision, the artifacts and the visual record.

Open the record for c55 →

Qpoint Brand Style Guide