Figma AI Dashboard Redesign
To close: Write an Outcome: plan not executed, redesign went code-first (c50, c59–c68, c81) · Move to HISTORY.md
last activity Apr 21
The product was turning toward AI, and Figma had drifted away from the code. The plan was to rebuild a clean Figma library first, then redesign the dashboard there.
A thorough plan and several prep lists, but the Figma work never happened. The redesign went straight into code instead, in later cycles.
Documents
With file names, on their own page →What changed
The two changes that matter most, in plain words. Open any one to see it.
- 1
The plan was to copy the parts we already had into a clean Figma library before inventing anything new.
Stock the pantry first
- 2
None of the three Figma files was made. The dashboard redesign went code-first on the design site.
The plan wasn't followed
- A library, a prototype file, and a throwaway AI scratch file, so experiments never leak into the library. In words
How we got here
Each change, traced back to the conversation it came from. A solid mark means the record names the source; a dashed one was matched by the draft and waits for review.
From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.
No ruling needed: the work itself is the change.
The plan was to copy the parts we already had into a clean Figma library before inventing anything new.
From the record: no recorded conversation behind this one.
No ruling needed: the work itself is the change.
None of the three Figma files was made. The dashboard redesign went code-first on the design site.
Thanks to
People outside Qpoint first. Every thank-you points at something they said or made.
All images
Every picture from this cycle. Click any one to step through them all.
The pairs
Everything captured · 0
The full record 0 decisions · 0 key-change entries · 2,460 words · 0 captures
The record stays as written, for agents and for audit: Key Changes, every decision, the artifacts and the visual record.
Open the record for c44 →