MOCK← Phase 4|
Findings

What is open, how fast are we responding, and where should we look next? · For Security

Last 30 days· compared with Aug 31 – Sep 29, 2026· PT

7 findings are open, 5 of them critical or high. 9 were new in this window and 21 were resolved, 5 days to resolve on average (17 resolved). 3 were blocked and 6 only observed.

Open now
7▼ 9
vs Aug 31 – Sep 29, 2026
backlog shrinking, 16 → 7
New
9
Resolved
21
Avg. to resolve
5 d
Blocked
3

Open now

as of Nov 1

What is open right now, and what deserves attention?

Triage severe or aging Findings.

1 critical4 high2 medium0 lowOldest open: 42 days
SeverityFindingPolicyTeamAgeOutcome
criticalAWS access key AKIA…7Q2F in a prompt at 11:47, from a pasted .env file; sent to the modelCredentials must not be sent to a modelEngineering25 dObserved
highA social security number reached the model unsanitisedSensitive information sanitized before transmissionEngineering42 dObserved
highA card number reached the model unsanitisedSensitive information sanitized before transmissionFinance42 dObserved
highA bank account number reached the model unsanitisedSensitive information sanitized before transmissionTeam B41 dObserved
highProvider account usera@gmail.com, not organisation-backedPersonal account is in useTeam A24 dObserved
mediumgithub.merge_pull_request ran without approval: #517 into main, 14 filesConsequential tool calls require approvalEngineering27 dObserved
mediumInstruction override in issue #482 "Build fails on arm64", read through GitHub MCP (score 0.91)Prompts are inspected for injection and leakageEngineering26 dObserved

The 7 highest-priority of 7 open, by severity, then age.

/api/security · findings · always as of the data cutoff, whatever the period

Resolved

in windowstaged

What was resolved during the period?

See what work was completed and why Findings closed. Resolving isn't always a technical fix.

Resolved
21
By a person
1
By a policy change
20
Average to resolve
5 d
17 findings
  • 15 now enforced
  • 3 prevented
  • 2 allowed
  • 1 By design

/api/security?period · resolutions

Backlog

over the windownot in qdash yet

Is the backlog growing or shrinking?

See whether investigation capacity is keeping up.

new resolved reopened

9 new, 21 resolved, 3 reopened. Backlog 16 at the start, 7 at the end.

finding status events · needs status history

Time to resolve

over the windownot in qdash yet

Are we responding faster?

Spot changes in response time without hiding the unresolved backlog.

average days to resolveno data
critical — (0)high 5.3 d (16)medium 0 d (1)low — (0)

From first detection to the latest resolve in the period, for each finding resolved at the data cutoff. A finding reopened and still open is backlog, so it isn't counted here.

finding status events

Most violated policies

in window

Which policies are violated most?

Prioritize investigation or policy review.

PolicyFindingsWorstTeams
Unsanctioned MCP server in use3high3
Personal account is in use1high1
Credentials must not be sent to a model1critical1
Prompts are inspected for injection and leakage1medium1
Consequential tool calls require approval1medium1
Restricted file access1high1
Approved model providers only1medium1

Findings first detected in the window. Top 7 of 7 policies.

/api/security?period · by policy

Blocked and observed

in window

What was blocked versus only observed?

See recorded blocking and observed exposure. A block isn't the same as a resolved Finding.

SeverityEnforcedObserved
critical01
high23
medium12
low00
All36

Counts Findings first detected in the window, not attempts or unique attacks. The outcome is what happened at detection: later policy changes don't rewrite it.

finding outcome at detection

Corrections

as of Nov 1staged

Which findings were answered by a completed training?

See where a finding became a correction. Names stay on the finding and in the audit log, not here (c133 D10).

Assigned
8
findings with a training
Completed
0
0 in this window
Waiting
8
nothing is blocked meanwhile
  • Unapproved MCP serversT-MCP-10 of 3 completed
  • Personal accounts for workT-ACCT-10 of 1 completed
  • Secrets in promptsT-SECRETS-10 of 1 completed
  • Instructions hidden in contentT-INJECT-10 of 1 completed
  • Ask before an agent sends or publishesT-APPROVAL-10 of 1 completed
  • Approved model providersT-PROVIDERS-10 of 1 completed

Who completed what is on each finding and in the audit log, not here.

training.completed.* · training-assignment messages (c133, proposed) · the lab counts this visit's completions

Data protection

in window

Which sensitive paths and secrets did agents touch?

See where sensitive data is exposed to agents.

Sensitive paths opened by agents629vs 678
Secrets or personal data in content58vs 69
Sensitive opens by kind
  • Credentials and keys214
  • Source and config182
  • Customer data132
  • HR and finance101

/api/dlp?period · seeded in the lab

Egress decisions

in window

What left the fleet, and what was stopped?

See risky destinations, and what enforcement stopped.

Allowed59,316
Observed only67
Blocked201

268 risky requests; 201 blocked (75%), 67 let through where policies only observe.

Where the risky traffic went
  • pastebin.compublic paste83
  • files.catbox.moeanonymous upload64
  • chat.openai.com (personal)personal account62
  • 203.0.113.42unknown host59

/api/egress-decisions · trends egress · seeded in the lab

Enforce-pilot candidates

in windowstaged

Where could we start enforcing?

Pick a manageable pilot. Nothing here changes a policy.

  • Agents may not run as root

    Consider enforcing this for Engineering. Over these 30 days, Qpoint monitored 1,608 sessions with no observed violations. Start with a pilot.

    Engineering · 100% of its endpoints covered · 1,608 monitored sessions · 0 observed · 0 exceptions
  • Tools must be on the allow list

    Consider enforcing this for Engineering. Over these 30 days, Qpoint monitored 1,403 sessions with no observed violations. Start with a pilot.

    Engineering · 100% of its endpoints covered · 1,403 monitored sessions · 0 observed · 0 exceptions
  • Agents run in a sandbox

    Consider enforcing this for Engineering. Over these 30 days, Qpoint monitored 1,403 sessions with no observed violations. Start with a pilot.

    Engineering · 100% of its endpoints covered · 1,403 monitored sessions · 0 observed · 0 exceptions

Few findings alone don't show a rollout will be painless, so start small. A recommendation never turns a policy on.

rule over mode, findings, sessions and coverage · monitored sessions are seeded

All teams · window Sep 30 – Oct 29, 2026 · data through Oct 29, 2026 · PT · generated Oct 29, 2026, 11:58 PM PT (mock)

Read-only: this report holds no controls. A saved PDF is a snapshot, and Qpoint can't update it later. Each section's source is named under it.