Source: qdash /team landing — c100 bake-off #1, 2026-09-28
One question — every team at once, through one lens — drawn four ways on the same fixture world. The lens set is the union of c100's (AI usage · Spend · Active · Violations · Coverage · Harness) and c67's levers (Waste · Retention; c67's Tokens is AI usage). Every control drives all four forms. Click any team to focus it everywhere — the portal gesture; on the real page it opens the team.
Tile map
Lever strip (c67)
Swarm rows
Team × lens matrix
| Team | AI usage ▾ | Spend | Active | Violations | Coverage | Claude Code | Waste | Retention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform 28 | 628.8M | $3.9k | 82% | 2 | 100% | 66% | $34 | 92% |
| ML Research 17 | 496.4M | $3.1k | 100% | 2 | 84% | 61% | $33 | 88% |
| Web 21 | 348.2M | $2.2k | 81% | clear | 100% | 78% | $394 | 67% |
| Payments 23 | 251.4M | $1.6k | 78% | 3 | 97% | 6% | $198 | 68% |
| Mobile 19 | 163.9M | $1.0k | 79% | 1 | 100% | 8% | $140 | 71% |
| Design 10 | 149.9M | $930 | 40% | clear | 100% | 11% | $116 | 80% |
| Data Eng 16 | 135.3M | $839 | 75% | 1 | 65% | 14% | $104 | 85% |
| Support 17 | 101.7M | $631 | 35% | clear | 100% | 23% | $81 | 57% |
| Sales Eng 14 | 54.3M | $337 | 50% | 2 | 67% | 6% | $95 | 38% |
| Finance 8 | 37.0M | $230 | 25% | clear | 92% | 25% | $0 | 100% |
| Security 8 | 35.1M | $218 | 63% | clear | 100% | 61% | $0 | 100% |
| Legal 6 | 0 | $0 | 0% | clear | 100% | 0% | $0 | 0% |
| Unassigned 13 | 204.2M | $1.3k | 69% | clear | 89% | 70% | $160 | 56% |
Shading is per column (each lens against its own max). Click a column header to switch the lens; rows re-sort worst-first.
The lens set — cut it to the best
Eight candidates. The pick for /team is probably four or five; the rest move to the Home specialist lenses or the team detail page. Colour jobs: volume and share are grape, light → dark; risk is status ink, only where > 0; gap is amber, only where the whole is incomplete.
| Lens | Asks | From | Colour job | Reader | My read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI usage | Where is AI work happening? | both | volume | Eng manager | keepthe default lens — where AI work is happening |
| Spend | Where is the money going? | both | volume | FinOps | keepthe CFO-by-department ask (Peterson call) |
| Active | Who is using it, and who isn't? | c100 | share | Eng manager | moveclose to AI usage; lives better in the Engineering Home lens |
| Violations | Where are policies being broken, and how long has it been? | both | risk | Security | keepthe security reader's reason to open /team |
| Coverage | Can we see everyone's machines? | both | gap | Security / IT | keepthe #1 story (bob-wire c21) — as a lens, not a band |
| Harness | How far has one harness spread? | c100 | share | Eng manager / IT | keepMark's Claude Code example; picker stays one click |
| Waste | Who stopped using what we pay for? | c67 | risk | FinOps | movea strong lever, but a Finance Home lens more than a team glance |
| Retention | Did it stick? | c67 | share | Eng manager | moveone ratio, no trend — team detail or the Engineering lens |
What to try, and what to look for
Which forms still read as one image at 40 teams? The tile map and swarm rows should hold; watch whether the strip becomes a wall.
The all-clear morning is the most common. Which form looks finished rather than empty when Violations and Coverage go quiet?
Everyone is Unassigned. Does the form make attribution debt the obvious next step, or does it just show one big box?
Does the same form work for volume (Usage, Spend), share (Active, Harness, Retention), risk (Violations, Waste) and gap (Coverage)? A form that needs a different shape per lens is really several forms.
Your example lens. Tile map shows share by team; swarm rows show who inside the team uses it. Which question were you asking?
Landings obey the pill. At 24h most people go idle — which form still says something useful?