Source: qdash landings — c100 bake-off #8, 2026-09-30
Nine ideas the ruling opened up ("explore possibilities, even if outside current data abilities"). None is served today. Each is one sketch: the question it answers, the image, the data it would need, where it would live, and my keep-or-kill read. The point is to decide which are worth a backend ask, not to polish them.
| to → | Anthropic | OpenAI | Azure OpenAI | Mistral | OpenRouter | Personal accounts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source code | 1.2B | 349.4M | 131.7M | 91.9M | 40.6M | 6.5M | 3.5M |
| Docs & tickets | 374.9M | 113.0M | 42.6M | 29.7M | 13.1M | 2.1M | 1.2M |
| Customer data | 85.2M | 25.7M | 9.7M | 6.8M | 3.0M | 480k | 586k |
| PII | 51.1M | 15.4M | 5.8M | 4.1M | 1.8M | 288k | 410k |
| Secrets & keys | 6.8M | 2.1M | 775k | 540k | 239k | 38k | 176k |
My read
Four are worth a backend ask now: X3 (data class × provider — the brand's first question, "where is my data going?", as one grid), X5 (spend forecast — Peterson's CFO ask, and the Finance lens has nothing honest without it), X9 (version drift — cheap, already half in the install records), and X2 (seats vs active — the single number a CFO acts on).
Two are worth keeping as sketches: X6 (adoption curves) waits on per-day people series; X8 (evidence shelf) waits on the controls backend. Both are strong images once the data exists.
Kill X1 as drawn. Work-type mix sounds useful but can't be derived honestly without reading prompts — the line c67 drew. If it comes back, it comes back from tool and file activity, and as a per-team fingerprint, not a mix chart. X4 and X7 fold into others: the approval ribbon is the Inventory arrivals card with a state machine; before/after is a time control on the Fleet floor, not its own view.