[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":668},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fPiKswM5PDVpv3OANC5Hdp4uXQPVGgYTPphE4cOPuVfo":3},{"newThing":4,"project":5,"cycle":8,"sections":21,"threads":583,"otherDocs":604,"images":606,"archiveItems":653,"links":662},null,{"id":6,"label":7,"liveBase":4},"design","Design",{"id":9,"num":10,"dir":11,"name":12,"title":12,"focus":13,"status":14,"statusNote":4,"created":15,"completed":4,"mode":4,"recordless":16,"thumbnail":17,"imageCount":18,"artifactCount":18,"lastActivity":19,"hasPickup":16,"hasInitialPrompt":20},"c68",68,"c68.index-overview","index-overview","Design the qdash landing page — what the user is greeted with on login, resolving the Fleet Overview \u002F Agent Inventory overlap.","active","2026-08-14",false,"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-glance-ideas.png",14,"2026-09-11",true,[22,36,46,107,433],{"key":23,"title":24,"empty":16,"ast":25},"why","Why",{"type":26,"children":27},"root",[28],{"type":29,"tag":30,"props":31,"children":32},"element","p",{},[33],{"type":34,"value":35},"text","The dashboard's current landing page is Fleet Overview, but there's confusing overlap between it and Agent Inventory. Before jumping to mocks, we need to think through what the first screen should actually present: what the user needs to see right away, what's less important, and what can be abstracted into a clear overview without encumbering cognitive load with verbose detail.",{"key":37,"title":38,"empty":16,"ast":39},"objective","Objective",{"type":26,"children":40},[41],{"type":29,"tag":30,"props":42,"children":43},{},[44],{"type":34,"value":45},"Answer \"what should the user be greeted with?\" — an at-a-glance overview (health, security posture, other things that can go wrong) plus gateways into the rest of the dashboard — then design the landing page from that answer. \"Done\" looks like: a clear content hierarchy for the index page and one or more design-site page mocks expressing it.",{"key":47,"title":48,"empty":16,"ast":49},"scope","Scope",{"type":26,"children":50},[51],{"type":29,"tag":52,"props":53,"children":54},"ul",{},[55,84,89],{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":57,"children":58},"li",{},[59,66,68,74,76,82],{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":61,"children":63},"code",{"className":62},[],[64],{"type":34,"value":65},"..\u002Fqcontrol\u002Fcrates\u002Fqdash\u002Fui\u002F",{"type":34,"value":67}," — current Fleet Overview + Agent Inventory, extended mid-cycle to ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":69,"children":71},{"className":70},[],[72],{"type":34,"value":73},"\u002Fposture",{"type":34,"value":75}," + ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":77,"children":79},{"className":78},[],[80],{"type":34,"value":81},"\u002Ffindings",{"type":34,"value":83}," for the consolidation analysis (read-only input)",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":85,"children":86},{},[87],{"type":34,"value":88},"Prior work: c59\u002Fc60 inventory design (presence\u002Fcoverage\u002Fat-risk band), c55 personas, c63 page-status, c64\u002Fc65 control-center",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":90,"children":91},{},[92,94,100,101],{"type":34,"value":93},"Design-site page mocks in ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":95,"children":97},{"className":96},[],[98],{"type":34,"value":99},"app\u002Fpages\u002Fpages\u002F",{"type":34,"value":75},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":102,"children":104},{"className":103},[],[105],{"type":34,"value":106},"app\u002Fdata\u002Fpage-registry.ts",{"key":108,"title":109,"empty":16,"ast":110},"key-changes","Key Changes",{"type":26,"children":111},[112],{"type":29,"tag":52,"props":113,"children":114},{},[115,158,168,201,218,256,273,290,308,340,372],{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":116,"children":117},{},[118,124,126,132,134,140,142,148,150,156],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":120,"children":121},"strong",{},[122],{"type":34,"value":123},"Phase 0 (2026-08-14):",{"type":34,"value":125}," ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":127,"children":129},{"className":128},[],[130],{"type":34,"value":131},"current-state.md",{"type":34,"value":133}," — full qdash audit of the ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":135,"children":137},{"className":136},[],[138],{"type":34,"value":139},"\u002F",{"type":34,"value":141}," landing (Fleet Overview) and ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":143,"children":145},{"className":144},[],[146],{"type":34,"value":147},"\u002Finventory",{"type":34,"value":149},", with a five-point overlap table (coverage, at-risk w\u002F mismatched thresholds, fleet counts, shadow AI, trend sparks) and the seam: Overview owns judgment, Inventory owns nouns. ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":151,"children":153},{"className":152},[],[154],{"type":34,"value":155},"plan.md",{"type":34,"value":157}," — five ranked landing questions, health taxonomy (security\u002Fmonitoring\u002Fcost\u002Foperational\u002Fgovernance), four-phase plan, six pattern candidates with a starting recommendation (verdict → attention → gateway cards).",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":159,"children":160},{},[161,166],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":162,"children":163},{},[164],{"type":34,"value":165},"Decisions (2026-08-14, Mark):",{"type":34,"value":167}," daily driver (exec summary parked as a separate future page) · scorecard demoted to a card · canonical coverage band lives on the landing · cycle ends at the mock (qdash port is a follow-on).",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":169,"children":170},{},[171,176,177,183,185,191,193,199],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":172,"children":173},{},[174],{"type":34,"value":175},"Phase 1 (2026-08-14):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":178,"children":180},{"className":179},[],[181],{"type":34,"value":182},"design-brief.md",{"type":34,"value":184}," — discovered two prior concept rounds for this exact surface (",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":186,"children":188},{"className":187},[],[189],{"type":34,"value":190},"\u002Fpages\u002Ffleet-overview-ideas",{"type":34,"value":192},", 8 concepts 2026-08-03; ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":194,"children":196},{"className":195},[],[197],{"type":34,"value":198},"\u002Fpages\u002Ffleet-overview-ideas-2",{"type":34,"value":200},", 4 analogue mechanisms 2026-08-04), so Phase 2 pivoted from re-ideation to synthesis. Brief locks the five-band hierarchy: verdict sentence → exception queue (empty when healthy, by design) → relocated c59 7b trust & presence band → gateway cards incl. the demoted \"Vs. goals\" card → quiet footer with install funnel.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":202,"children":203},{},[204,209,210,216],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":205,"children":206},{},[207],{"type":34,"value":208},"Phase 2\u002F3 merged — v1 (2026-08-14):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":211,"children":213},{"className":212},[],[214],{"type":34,"value":215},"\u002Fpages\u002Findex-overview-v1",{"type":34,"value":217}," built and registered (overview group) — the composed daily-driver landing with both designed states behind a render toggle (Meridian Monday attention day \u002F all clear), consistent c59 numbers (34 · 39 · 87% · 5 shadow · at-risk 4), unified at-risk definition, and a composition-sources note on the page. Smoke-checked: 200, clean dev log.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":219,"children":220},{},[221,226,227,233,235,240,242,247,249,254],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":222,"children":223},{},[224],{"type":34,"value":225},"Overlap-analysis thread (2026-08-14):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":228,"children":230},{"className":229},[],[231],{"type":34,"value":232},"posture-findings-overlap-analysis.md",{"type":34,"value":234}," — landing vs ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":236,"children":238},{"className":237},[],[239],{"type":34,"value":73},{"type":34,"value":241}," vs ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":243,"children":245},{"className":244},[],[246],{"type":34,"value":81},{"type":34,"value":248}," friction named (three verdicts no master, three at-risk definitions, coverage told 4×, config risk has no action surface). Recommendation: dissolve ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":250,"children":252},{"className":251},[],[253],{"type":34,"value":73},{"type":34,"value":255}," — factors become triageable configuration findings in a unified Security worklist with a posture-analytics band, installs table → Inventory, score judgment → landing. Plus the Estate-strip proposal (asset deltas as judgment).",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":257,"children":258},{},[259,264,265,271],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":260,"children":261},{},[262],{"type":34,"value":263},"v2 (2026-08-14):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":266,"children":268},{"className":267},[],[269],{"type":34,"value":270},"\u002Fpages\u002Findex-overview-v2",{"type":34,"value":272}," built and registered — v1 + the analysis applied: estate strip with deltas in the trust band (footer keeps only the funnel), \"Sandbox disabled on marcus's Claude Code\" configuration finding in the queue (verdict counts 5), Findings + Posture gateway cards consolidated into one wide Security card (worklist counts + score as registers of one surface), at-risk tile links \"→ Security\". v1 untouched for side-by-side. Smoke-checked: 200, clean log.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":274,"children":275},{},[276,281,282,288],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":277,"children":278},{},[279],{"type":34,"value":280},"Verdict-ideas thread (2026-08-14, Mark: \"don't love the 5 things needing attention\"):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":283,"children":285},{"className":284},[],[286],{"type":34,"value":287},"\u002Fpages\u002Findex-verdict-ideas",{"type":34,"value":289}," — five verdict+queue treatments against the same Monday story: (1) grouped-count family chips replacing the enumerating sentence, (2) worst-thing-first hero with \"and 4 more\" expander, (3) queue-as-greeting with slim status line and no verdict layer, (4) Act·Decide·Review verb grouping matching the triage workflow, (5) since-Friday delta verdict with NEW\u002FAGING row badges. Shared parameterized QueueRow; comparison notes on-page. Registered, smoke-checked 200 with all five sections rendering.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":291,"children":292},{},[293,298,300,306],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":294,"children":295},{},[296],{"type":34,"value":297},"Queue-ideas thread (2026-08-14, Mark's screenshot critique — the row layer-cake):",{"type":34,"value":299}," diagnosis: each queue row spent four attention devices (left border + family tag + NEW badge + toned link) inside its own bordered card. ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":301,"children":303},{"className":302},[],[304],{"type":34,"value":305},"\u002Fpages\u002Findex-queue-ideas",{"type":34,"value":307}," — five compact treatments, one device per row: (1) hairline list (no cards, severity dot only, ~half height), (2) one-card dot rail (queue as a single object, rail as severity map), (3) mini table (aligned sev\u002Fitem\u002Fage\u002Faction columns), (4) hero + ticker (worst item is the only card, rest are expandable chips — two lines total), (5) briefing lines (glyph-led prose, no containers). Registered, smoke-checked 200.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":309,"children":310},{},[311,316,317,323,325,331,333,338],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":312,"children":313},{},[314],{"type":34,"value":315},"Glance-ideas thread (2026-08-14, Mark: broader, more visual, more abstraction — details behind a click):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":318,"children":320},{"className":319},[],[321],{"type":34,"value":322},"\u002Fpages\u002Findex-glance-ideas",{"type":34,"value":324}," — five visual-first attention abstractions of the Monday story: (1) annunciator panel (fixed domain cells, lit vs dim ✓, cockpit language), (2) fleet pixel grid (34 cells + 5 dashed shadow ghosts — attention as ",{"type":29,"tag":326,"props":327,"children":328},"em",{},[329],{"type":34,"value":330},"where",{"type":34,"value":332},", scales past lists), (3) domain health meters (equalizer skyline as the verdict), (4) week strip (events positioned in time, the aging config item as a 3-week amber tail — age is length), (5) pixel-pawn lineup (brand-native: sofia errored, felix needs-input, kai asleep, chen as dashed ghost — attention as ",{"type":29,"tag":326,"props":334,"children":335},{},[336],{"type":34,"value":337},"who needs help",{"type":34,"value":339},"). Each with hover identity + click-to-item; summary owns the surface. Registered, smoke-checked 200 clean.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":341,"children":342},{},[343,348,349,355,357,362,364,370],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":344,"children":345},{},[346],{"type":34,"value":347},"Inventory-card thread (2026-08-27, Mark's manual three-card design — Compliance · SLA Findings · Inventory with a body-figure estate):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":350,"children":352},{"className":351},[],[353],{"type":34,"value":354},"inventory-card-possibility-space.md",{"type":34,"value":356}," — the health seam answered (findings = adjudicated health per c79's condition model; the durable seam is register not topic: Inventory is the physical exam, Findings the diagnosis; the mock's \"Un-allowed Skill Detected\" is a condition and belongs to Findings, Inventory lights the body part and links). Exhaustive 15-category taxonomy of inventory-card content, every idea tagged with backing API fields and buildability tier (T1 live \u002F T2 derivable \u002F T3 needs-backend). Body-figure ruling: ",{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":358,"children":359},{},[360],{"type":34,"value":361},"color = visibility\u002Fvetting state, not posture",{"type":34,"value":363}," — torso\u002FMCP-arm\u002Flegs can light honestly today, head\u002Fhips ship calm until an ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":365,"children":367},{"className":366},[],[368],{"type":34,"value":369},"asset_vetting",{"type":34,"value":371}," registry exists (the named smallest backend ask). Ranked recommendation: estate register (weight) · coverage hero absolute (31\u002F39) · one unvetted-entry tone line · figure · coverage spark; cuts: denied\u002Fposture\u002Ffabricated sparks\u002Fcost\u002F\"Repos\" label. Decisions (Mark): doc first, mock later · content explored freely, figure as one treatment.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":373,"children":374},{},[375,380,381,387,389,395,397,403,405,411,413,418,420,431],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":376,"children":377},{},[378],{"type":34,"value":379},"Three-card-mock build (2026-08-27):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":382,"children":384},{"className":383},[],[385],{"type":34,"value":386},"\u002Fpages\u002Findex-three-cards-v1",{"type":34,"value":388}," built and registered (overview group) — Mark's two-state manual design at Meridian numbers: derived Full\u002FPartial Visibility verdict (39\u002F39 vs 34\u002F39·87%, toggle flips only what visibility owns — Compliance and SLA read the same world in both states, the seam in action), placeholder ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":390,"children":392},{"className":391},[],[393],{"type":34,"value":394},"InventoryBodyFigure",{"type":34,"value":396}," component (per-part tone API, ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":398,"children":400},{"className":399},[],[401],{"type":34,"value":402},"data-part",{"type":34,"value":404}," swap contract for Mark's SVG), estate rows with authored 7d deltas (the one authored value, noted on-page), intake-language exceptions footer (5 shadow · unvetted pg-tools, straight from fixtures), derived compliance scores (83%, fixture's two frameworks replacing the design's five), and fully derived SLA deadlines (calendar-day math; nothing near breach in this world, so the design's deadline inks honestly don't fire). Captured both states (",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":406,"children":408},{"className":407},[],[409],{"type":34,"value":410},"c68-three-cards-{partial,full}.png",{"type":34,"value":412},"). Smoke: 200, both states verified visually. ",{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":414,"children":415},{},[416],{"type":34,"value":417},"Round 2 (Mark's four changes):",{"type":34,"value":419}," Go ▶ on all three cards · SLA card made consistent with findings-regroup-v2 by ",{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":421,"children":422},{},[423,425],{"type":34,"value":424},"extracting ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":426,"children":428},{"className":427},[],[429],{"type":34,"value":430},"LifecycleFindingsDigest",{"type":34,"value":432}," (severity box + remediation-deadlines list) from regroup-v2's policy expansion — both surfaces now wear the same organ (regroup-v2 re-verified rendering identically post-extraction) · verdict font-exbold · Compliance % Inter black (mono dropped).",{"key":434,"title":435,"empty":16,"ast":436},"extra","Open Threads",{"type":26,"children":437},[438],{"type":29,"tag":52,"props":439,"children":440},{},[441,480,497,507,517,534,573],{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":442,"children":443},{},[444,449,451,456,458,463,465,470,472,478],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":445,"children":446},{},[447],{"type":34,"value":448},"Pick the attention treatment:",{"type":34,"value":450}," three ideas rounds await Mark's reaction — verdict language (",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":452,"children":454},{"className":453},[],[455],{"type":34,"value":287},{"type":34,"value":457},"), compact queue (",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":459,"children":461},{"className":460},[],[462],{"type":34,"value":305},{"type":34,"value":464},"), visual abstraction (",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":466,"children":468},{"className":467},[],[469],{"type":34,"value":322},{"type":34,"value":471},"). Next step: compose the picks into ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":473,"children":475},{"className":474},[],[476],{"type":34,"value":477},"index-overview-v3",{"type":34,"value":479},".",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":481,"children":482},{},[483,488,490,495],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":484,"children":485},{},[486],{"type":34,"value":487},"Consolidation decision:",{"type":34,"value":489}," the posture\u002Ffindings recommendation (dissolve ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":491,"children":493},{"className":492},[],[494],{"type":34,"value":73},{"type":34,"value":496},", configuration findings in a unified Security worklist) is applied in the v2 mock but not yet ratified as the qdash direction.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":498,"children":499},{},[500,505],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":501,"children":502},{},[503],{"type":34,"value":504},"Parked (Mark):",{"type":34,"value":506}," an executive-summary surface as a separate page, out of c68 scope.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":508,"children":509},{},[510,515],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":511,"children":512},{},[513],{"type":34,"value":514},"Pawn-lineup visual check:",{"type":34,"value":516}," pawn art inlines client-side; the lineup's states\u002Fghost treatment need one look in the browser.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":518,"children":519},{},[520,525,527,532],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":521,"children":522},{},[523],{"type":34,"value":524},"Inventory-card follow-on (Mark):",{"type":34,"value":526}," resolved toward transcription — see three-card-mock thread below. Bake-off variants (concentration-first hero) remain available in ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":528,"children":530},{"className":529},[],[531],{"type":34,"value":354},{"type":34,"value":533}," §4.",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":535,"children":536},{},[537,542,543,549,551,556,558,563,565,571],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":538,"children":539},{},[540],{"type":34,"value":541},"Body-figure SVG (Mark):",{"type":34,"value":125},{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":544,"children":546},{"className":545},[],[547],{"type":34,"value":548},"index-three-cards-v1",{"type":34,"value":550}," renders a placeholder ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":552,"children":554},{"className":553},[],[555],{"type":34,"value":394},{"type":34,"value":557},"; Mark's SVG drops in over the same ",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":559,"children":561},{"className":560},[],[562],{"type":34,"value":402},{"type":34,"value":564}," ids + tone API (",{"type":29,"tag":60,"props":566,"children":568},{"className":567},[],[569],{"type":34,"value":570},"app\u002Fcomponents\u002Finventory\u002FBodyFigure.vue",{"type":34,"value":572},").",{"type":29,"tag":56,"props":574,"children":575},{},[576,581],{"type":29,"tag":119,"props":577,"children":578},{},[579],{"type":34,"value":580},"Tint divergence check (Mark):",{"type":34,"value":582}," the built attention state tints MCP arm + legs (matching the Meridian exceptions: pg-tools unvetted, 5 shadow installs) instead of the design's Tools\u002FSkills arm — deliberate, flagged in the page's composition notes; needs Mark's reaction.",[584,587,591,594,597,601],{"name":585,"prompt":586,"plan":4},"glance-ideas","glance-ideas-prompt.md",{"name":588,"prompt":589,"plan":590},"inventory-card","inventory-card-prompt.md","inventory-card-plan.md",{"name":592,"prompt":593,"plan":4},"posture-findings-overlap","posture-findings-overlap-prompt.md",{"name":595,"prompt":596,"plan":4},"queue-ideas","queue-ideas-prompt.md",{"name":598,"prompt":599,"plan":600},"three-card-mock","three-card-mock-prompt.md","three-card-mock-plan.md",{"name":602,"prompt":603,"plan":4},"verdict-ideas","verdict-ideas-prompt.md",[131,182,605,354,155,232],"initial-prompt.md",[607,612,616,620,623,626,628,632,636,638,641,644,647,650],{"src":608,"kind":609,"order":610,"caption":611},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-overview-v1.png","hero",2,"c68 composed daily-driver landing — verdict sentence, exception queue, relocated trust & presence band, gateway cards with demoted scorecard; attention + all-clear states",{"src":613,"kind":609,"order":614,"caption":615},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-verdict-ideas.png",3,"Five treatments of the landing greeting — grouped-count chips, worst-thing-first hero, queue-as-greeting, Act·Decide·Review verbs, since-Friday deltas",{"src":617,"kind":609,"order":618,"caption":619},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-queue-ideas.png",4,"Five compact attention-queue treatments — hairline list, dot-rail card, mini table, hero + ticker chips, briefing lines; one attention device per row",{"src":17,"kind":609,"order":621,"caption":622},5,"Five visual-abstraction attention treatments — annunciator panel, fleet pixel grid, domain health meters, week-strip timeline, pixel-pawn lineup; details one click away",{"src":624,"kind":609,"order":625},"\u002Farchive\u002F2026-q3\u002Fc68-index-overview-v2.png",4999,{"src":627,"kind":609,"order":625},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-three-cards-partial.png",{"src":629,"kind":630,"order":610,"caption":631},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-fleet-overview-ideas-2.png","slice","Analogue-driven concepts — dispatch board, situation map, factory-floor wall mode, order of battle, mechanism inventory",{"src":633,"kind":634,"order":635},"\u002Farchive\u002F2026-q3\u002Fc68-index-overview-v2-full.png","full",9000,{"src":637,"kind":634,"order":635},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-three-cards-full.png",{"src":639,"kind":634,"order":640},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-fleet-overview-ideas-2-full.png",9001,{"src":642,"kind":634,"order":643},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-overview-v1-full.png",9002,{"src":645,"kind":634,"order":646},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-verdict-ideas-full.png",9003,{"src":648,"kind":634,"order":649},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-queue-ideas-full.png",9004,{"src":651,"kind":634,"order":652},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc68-index-glance-ideas-full.png",9005,[654],{"path":655,"title":656,"image":624,"gallery":657},"archive\u002F2026-q3\u002F2026-08-15-c68-index-overview-v2","Index Overview v2",[658,660],{"src":624,"alt":659},"Index overview v2 — verdict-first landing page composition.",{"src":633,"alt":661},"Index Overview v2 — full page",[663,664,665,666,667],{"route":198,"href":198},{"route":322,"href":322},{"route":215,"href":215},{"route":305,"href":305},{"route":287,"href":287},1789151074011]