[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":1275},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fWsYDPmJ-Fl_r0safgk1R-u7K-Cgm9cQpjzkZztp1-Tg":3},{"newThing":4,"project":5,"cycle":8,"sections":24,"threads":1105,"otherDocs":1137,"images":1138,"archiveItems":1250,"links":1259},null,{"id":6,"label":7,"liveBase":4},"design","Design",{"id":9,"num":10,"dir":11,"name":12,"title":13,"focus":14,"status":15,"statusNote":16,"created":17,"completed":4,"mode":4,"recordless":18,"thumbnail":19,"imageCount":20,"artifactCount":21,"lastActivity":22,"hasPickup":18,"hasInitialPrompt":23},"c67",67,"c67.teams","teams","Teams","Refine the qdash `\u002Fteams` design — composition from c61 concepts, mapping workspace as the pre-SCIM write path, slim spend overview, credentials relocated","active","design track done — at the checkpoint gate","2026-08-14",false,"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v2.png",32,18,"2026-09-11",true,[25,61,79,240,1021],{"key":26,"title":27,"empty":18,"ast":28},"why","Why",{"type":29,"children":30},"root",[31,39],{"type":32,"tag":33,"props":34,"children":35},"element","p",{},[36],{"type":37,"value":38},"text","c61 covered both qdash pages but the work diverged: integrations ran 11 iterations, got layer extractions, and shipped to feat\u002Fcontrol-center; teams stopped after one day at research + a single 4-concept ideas mock. The research is strong (10-product competitive scan, ranked JTBD, 4 built concepts + two composed-stack candidates) but nothing was iterated, composed, or shipped. Splitting teams into its own cycle gives that half the same refinement arc integrations got — without redoing any research.",{"type":32,"tag":33,"props":40,"children":41},{},[42,44,51,53,59],{"type":37,"value":43},"The page itself has real problems the research surfaced: \"Spend by team\" duplicates Cost Center's table from the same ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":46,"children":48},"code",{"className":47},[],[49],{"type":37,"value":50},"\u002Fapi\u002Fcosts.by_team",{"type":37,"value":52}," field (with a cross-footing bug between the two); team \"management\" is a free-text string typed into a hidden inline cell; the credentials table near-duplicates ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":54,"children":56},{"className":55},[],[57],{"type":37,"value":58},"\u002Fidentity",{"type":37,"value":60}," with a cruder risk formula; and the most important under-served job — mapping observed identities to the real org — has no designed surface at all.",{"key":62,"title":63,"empty":18,"ast":64},"objective","Objective",{"type":29,"children":65},[66],{"type":32,"tag":33,"props":67,"children":68},{},[69,71,77],{"type":37,"value":70},"Deliver iterated design mocks composing the c61 teams concepts into a ship-ready page recommendation, with the four product decisions applied (see ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":72,"children":74},{"className":73},[],[75],{"type":37,"value":76},"teams-refinement-plan.md",{"type":37,"value":78},"). Ends at a review checkpoint with Mark — qdash\u002Fbackend changes are a gated follow-on, not in this cycle's initial scope.",{"key":80,"title":81,"empty":18,"ast":82},"scope","Scope",{"type":29,"children":83},[84,93,190,198],{"type":32,"tag":33,"props":85,"children":86},{},[87],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":89,"children":90},"strong",{},[91],{"type":37,"value":92},"In:",{"type":32,"tag":94,"props":95,"children":96},"ul",{},[97,108,137,150,155],{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":99,"children":100},"li",{},[101,106],{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":102,"children":104},{"className":103},[],[105],{"type":37,"value":76},{"type":37,"value":107}," — locked IA recommendation (section order tied to ranked JTBD) + decisions record",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":109,"children":110},{},[111,113,119,121,127,129,135],{"type":37,"value":112},"Design iterations on the design site: ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":114,"children":116},{"className":115},[],[117],{"type":37,"value":118},"teams-ideas-v2",{"type":37,"value":120}," (composition bake-off: Stack A vs Stack B), ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":122,"children":124},{"className":123},[],[125],{"type":37,"value":126},"teams-ideas-v3",{"type":37,"value":128}," (mapping workspace + credentials-gist exploration), ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":130,"children":132},{"className":131},[],[133],{"type":37,"value":134},"teams-ideas-v4",{"type":37,"value":136}," (visual\u002Faffordance pass + adoption strip)",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":138,"children":139},{},[140,142,148],{"type":37,"value":141},"page-registry entries per mock (group ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":143,"children":145},{"className":144},[],[146],{"type":37,"value":147},"admin",{"type":37,"value":149},")",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":151,"children":152},{},[153],{"type":37,"value":154},"Checkpoint presentation: chosen stack, mapping form factor, credentials gist, spend overview treatment, Cost Center EXP-gate question",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":156,"children":157},{},[158,164,166,172,174,180,182,188],{"type":32,"tag":159,"props":160,"children":161},"em",{},[162],{"type":37,"value":163},"(scope grew 2026-08-14\u002F15, per Mark's iteration prompts)",{"type":37,"value":165}," the page arc v5–v8 (states & scale, state machine + component audit, component-native pass, person expand card) and the Teams-strip series (",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":167,"children":169},{"className":168},[],[170],{"type":37,"value":171},"teams-strip-*",{"type":37,"value":173},": metrics, axis, portals, overdrive, swarm, bites, levers, horizons, windows) — each thread documented as ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":175,"children":177},{"className":176},[],[178],{"type":37,"value":179},"strip-*-prompt.md",{"type":37,"value":181},"\u002F",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":183,"children":185},{"className":184},[],[186],{"type":37,"value":187},"-plan.md",{"type":37,"value":189}," in this directory",{"type":32,"tag":33,"props":191,"children":192},{},[193],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":194,"children":195},{},[196],{"type":37,"value":197},"Out:",{"type":32,"tag":94,"props":199,"children":200},{},[201,206,211],{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":202,"children":203},{},[204],{"type":37,"value":205},"Any qcontrol\u002Fqdash code changes before the checkpoint (ship track documented in the plan doc, gated on review)",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":207,"children":208},{},[209],{"type":37,"value":210},"SCIM\u002FIdP implementation (stays a projected mock)",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":212,"children":213},{},[214,216,222,224,230,232,238],{"type":37,"value":215},"Re-research — c61's ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":217,"children":219},{"className":218},[],[220],{"type":37,"value":221},"research-teams.md",{"type":37,"value":223},", ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":225,"children":227},{"className":226},[],[228],{"type":37,"value":229},"research.md",{"type":37,"value":231}," §2, and ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":233,"children":235},{"className":234},[],[236],{"type":37,"value":237},"teams-ideas.vue",{"type":37,"value":239}," are inputs, not open questions",{"key":241,"title":242,"empty":18,"ast":243},"key-changes","Key Changes",{"type":29,"children":244},[245],{"type":32,"tag":94,"props":246,"children":247},{},[248,273,291,316,333,343,360,377,394,411,436,453,470,551,583,649,715,794,914,988],{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":249,"children":250},{},[251,256,258,264,266,271],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":252,"children":253},{},[254],{"type":37,"value":255},"Cycle split (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":257}," Created from c61's teams stream — see ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":259,"children":261},{"className":260},[],[262],{"type":37,"value":263},"initial-prompt.md",{"type":37,"value":265}," and ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":267,"children":269},{"className":268},[],[270],{"type":37,"value":76},{"type":37,"value":272},".",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":274,"children":275},{},[276,281,283,289],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":277,"children":278},{},[279],{"type":37,"value":280},"teams-ideas-v2 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282}," ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":284,"children":286},{"className":285},[],[287],{"type":37,"value":288},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v2",{"type":37,"value":290}," — composition bake-off. Coda Stacks A (\"accountable roster\") and B (\"teams first\") each rendered as a full composed page with the four decisions applied: one merged caveat, mapping coverage % in the summary strip, risk-story roster with per-person identity-gist chip (→ \u002Fidentity), unmapped band (A) vs mapping drawer (B), slim team cost overview with share bars + \"Cost Center →\" handoff, adoption strip (fleet-level in A, per-team in B). Verdict: Stack A with B's card language — J1 is the top job, IA doc calls the page a Fleet lens, and 4 free-text teams don't earn cards as the organizing unit pre-SCIM. v3 opens: mapping form factor (band\u002Fdrawer\u002Fsub-route), identity-gist depth, adoption slot, Cost Center EXP gate. Type floor corrected to text-11 (v1 used text-10, which silently renders 16px).",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":292,"children":293},{},[294,299,300,306,308,314],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":295,"children":296},{},[297],{"type":37,"value":298},"teams-ideas-v3 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":301,"children":303},{"className":302},[],[304],{"type":37,"value":305},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v3",{"type":37,"value":307}," — the write path designed. Three mapping form factors on A's spine: inline band (expands in place, cheapest interruption), slide-over drawer (full evidence one-at-a-time, but modal and fights bulk), sub-route ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":309,"children":311},{"className":310},[],[312],{"type":37,"value":313},"\u002Fteams\u002Fmapping",{"type":37,"value":315}," (queue\u002Fdormant\u002Fhistory tabs, org rail, Okta-remapped lifecycle new→mapped→dormant→archived with disable-don't-delete). Identity gist at three depths (chip only \u002F chip + method \u002F icon + posture summary strip). Verdict: band primary with \"open workspace →\" escalation to the sub-route; drawer cut; gist = chip + conditional posture strip (appears only while consumer keys > 0).",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":317,"children":318},{},[319,324,325,331],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":320,"children":321},{},[322],{"type":37,"value":323},"teams-ideas-v4 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":326,"children":328},{"className":327},[],[329],{"type":37,"value":330},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v4",{"type":37,"value":332}," — single composed ship candidate in the shipped-integrations idiom (heavy-rule sections: text-18 bold + 3px grey-300 rule + text-11 why-line). Stack A spine with v3 verdicts folded in. Remaining calls made and annotated: adoption folds into deltas (people stat + team-chip pills, no separate strip at 14 people), team drill-down is filter-in-place (team detail page deferred to SCIM day), mapping band ships collapsed. Ends with the 5-item checkpoint agenda (composition, mapping model, gist depth, adoption\u002Fdrill-down calls, Cost Center EXP gate).",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":334,"children":335},{},[336,341],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":337,"children":338},{},[339],{"type":37,"value":340},"Verification (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":342}," All three pages SSR 200 on the live dev server, Tailwind rescan via nuxt.config touch after each new file.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":344,"children":345},{},[346,351,353,358],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":347,"children":348},{},[349],{"type":37,"value":350},"Registry section split (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":352}," New ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":354,"children":356},{"className":355},[],[357],{"type":37,"value":12},{"type":37,"value":359}," page group (\"Teams & Users — People, teams, and identity attribution pages\") between Security and Admin; all four teams-ideas pages moved into it. Admin group description trimmed to \"Org and connector administration pages\".",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":361,"children":362},{},[363,368,369,375],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":364,"children":365},{},[366],{"type":37,"value":367},"teams-ideas-v5 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":370,"children":372},{"className":371},[],[373],{"type":37,"value":374},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v5",{"type":37,"value":376}," — states & scale pass on the v4 composition. Four states: first-run (mapping workspace as onboarding hero, teams created in the act of assigning, no roster yet), all-clear (verdict \"Nothing needs you\", roster falls back to spend order as the attribution ledger, every conditional gone), attention·14 (v4 corrected — verdict line names the work, level-1 expand row designed with top_context chips, level 2 stays AgentExpandDetail), attention·214 (search primary, band drops \"map here\" above ~8 queue items and becomes pure escalation, team chips cap at top-5-by-spend + unassigned with the tail behind Cost Center). Corrections: verdict line above the strip in every state; amber grammar tightened to attribution debt only (alias, unassigned, band) — credential gist and spend outliers go neutral, severity lives on \u002Fidentity and Cost Center. Fixtures mirror userRollups() keys + \u002Fapi\u002Fcosts by_team rows so the ship rewrite is transcription. New checkpoint item 6: period control (?period= on \u002Fteams vs pinning \u002Fcost?period=30d on handoff).",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":378,"children":379},{},[380,385,386,392],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":381,"children":382},{},[383],{"type":37,"value":384},"teams-ideas-v6 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":387,"children":389},{"className":388},[],[390],{"type":37,"value":391},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v6",{"type":37,"value":393}," — state machine + component mapping. The four v5 states rendered from one template with a live UxTabGroup switcher (proof the design is conditionals over a single composition, not four designs); section × state matrix as the rewrite spec; onboarding progress line added to first-run (\"3 of 8 assigned · $12 of $41 attributed\"); vocabulary locked — assign (act) \u002F mapped (state) \u002F attributed (money), \"map here ▾\" corrected to \"assign here ▾\". Component audit against component-registry.ts (151 components) + qdash locals: table\u002Fchips\u002Fbars\u002Fsearch map cleanly (DataTable #details, UxTag, UxCode, UxPercentBar, UxTabGroup, UxAvatar — the last two used live in the mock); qdash PageHeader and StatTile are promotion candidates; three confirmed gaps — verdict line (shared need with c68 index), toned stat sub-line, dashed amber band (hand-rolled 3× in v5). Extraction shortlist ranked with one prerequisite: amber enters the layer tone vocabulary (UxPill stops at warn). Note: layer CLAUDE.md\u002Fcatalog-skill are stale (~35 components) — component-registry.ts is authoritative.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":395,"children":396},{},[397,402,403,409],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":398,"children":399},{},[400],{"type":37,"value":401},"teams-ideas-v7 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":404,"children":406},{"className":405},[],[407],{"type":37,"value":408},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v7",{"type":37,"value":410}," — the four states rebuilt on real components, iterating from v5. Roster = layer DataTable: per-column #slots, #details expand in the house ExpandRow card (agents with UxCode context chips + UxPill danger), column search at scale (search: true on Person replaces the hand-rolled search bar), limit + #footer for the collapsed tails, numeric spend so column sort works. UxAvatar in every person cell (incl. first-run queue), UxTag for the scale filter chip. Teams section = v6's chip row cherry-picked whole, kept as one local functional component (TeamChipRow) so the ShareChip extraction boundary is pre-drawn. Findings from the swap: the column config IS the state machine (all-clear\u002Fattention\u002Fscale are one component + different column arrays and slot presence); DataTable seams — footer is bottom-right not a full-width tail row, and sort is header-label-based so risk-rank relies on row order until a riskScore column exists. Verdict line, toned stat subs, amber band, share chip stay hand-rolled — the four confirmed v6 gaps.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":412,"children":413},{},[414,419,420,426,428,434],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":415,"children":416},{},[417],{"type":37,"value":418},"teams-ideas-v8 (2026-08-14):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":421,"children":423},{"className":422},[],[424],{"type":37,"value":425},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-ideas-v8",{"type":37,"value":427}," + ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":429,"children":431},{"className":430},[],[432],{"type":37,"value":433},"app\u002Fcomponents\u002Fteams\u002FPersonExpandCard.vue",{"type":37,"value":435}," — the person expand card designed. Avatar fix: v7 (and v1) crushed UxAvatar initials with a text override; the component's real sizes are small w-9\u002Ftext-18, reg w-11\u002Ftext-21 — override removed. Every person row in every state now expands (DataTable bareDetails + the c59 UxTableListExpandSection stack) into TeamsPersonExpandCard: (1) identity & attribution — reg avatar, mono email, source pill → \u002Fidentity, alias explained (felix's @duck.com merge note), OS user\u002Fmachines\u002Ffirst-last seen, team with change\u002Fassign write path; (2) open work — conditional, the risk story exploded into severity + description + verb rows; (3) agents & usage — agent rows with UxCode top_context chips + a usage line (tokens\u002F% fleet, spend, model chips, tools\u002FMCP). Card replaces the interim AgentExpandDetail at level 1; per-agent \"detail →\" stays level 2. Deliberate omissions: credential math (\u002Fidentity), spend history (Cost Center), session logs (agent detail). Could-adds parked for checkpoint: activity sparkline, per-model spend, recent sessions, inline egress decisions.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":437,"children":438},{},[439,444,445,451],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":440,"children":441},{},[442],{"type":37,"value":443},"teams-strip-ideas (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":446,"children":448},{"className":447},[],[449],{"type":37,"value":450},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-ideas",{"type":37,"value":452}," — the Teams strip gains a metric lens. Full catalog brainstormed (spend\u002Fadoption\u002Frisk\u002Fidentity families × ranked jobs; per-team trends impossible — daily series is fleet-wide). Five lenses picked for a UxTabGroup switcher (c66 idiom, mode semantics — FilterGroup and dropdown rejected on the page): Spend (default, reconciles with Cost Center), $\u002Fperson (honest cross-team comparison), Active now (only near-real-time signal), Risk (triage heatmap), Agents\u002Fperson (adoption depth). Excluded with reasons: Tokens (Cost Center owns the unit toggle), Sessions, People (permanent sub-line anchor), riskScore (sort-only). Four bar semantics, one chip geometry: share-of-total (grey, sums to 100%), per-person scaled-to-max (% dropped from sub-line), fraction-of-self meter (success hue announces the switch), counts-with-severity (no bar — severity never encodes length; \"1 Crit · 2 Elev\" in words, \"clear\" quietly). Sort follows the lens desc, Unassigned pins last (amber value in every mode; per-identity denominators; \"3 of 61 running\" as mapping prompt). Two live strips — Meridian + scale, where the top-5 cap re-ranks per lens (Research\u002F$-per-person, Support-Ops\u002FActive, Core-Banking\u002FRisk surface; none are top spenders). Ship notes: ?teamsBy= URL sync, tooltip = full stat sheet, per-chip estimated asterisk, teamRollups() as the fleet-rollups.ts sibling, by_team-vs-rollup unassigned seam handled by union.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":454,"children":455},{},[456,461,462,468],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":457,"children":458},{},[459],{"type":37,"value":460},"teams-strip-axis (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":463,"children":465},{"className":464},[],[466],{"type":37,"value":467},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-axis",{"type":37,"value":469}," — nine live treatments of the Teams strip on a simplicity ↔ expressiveness axis, lensed baseline at 0, shared lens switcher where treatments can listen. Simplicity: −1 quiet chips (name+value pills, stat sheet on hover — the responsive collapse), −2 ticker (one prose line — the export\u002Fdigest form), −3 one bar (single stacked proportional object — share-only, the first casualty of abstraction is lens flexibility), −4 headline (one verdict fact per lens). Expressiveness: +1 stat chips (all five metrics per chip — kills cross-team scanning, the tooltip does this job better), +2 fingerprints (normalized column shapes — interesting failure, demands expertise), +3 people cards (one state-colored dot per person — composition instead of aggregate; felix IS the red dot), +4 matrix (scoreboard table, every column keeps its own bar semantic — DataTable, nearly free, but it's the Cost Center table upgrade, not a strip). Axis punchline: the lens switcher exists exactly at the midpoint — simpler loses lenses one by one, richer stops needing them. Verdict: baseline holds the working state; the headline (−4) becomes the all-clear Teams voice (and the c68 landing candidate); people cards (+3) are the challenger to test at checkpoint, with a density question above ~12 people\u002Fteam.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":471,"children":472},{},[473,478,479,485,487,493,494,499,501,507,508,514,516,521,523,528,530,535,537,542,544,549],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":474,"children":475},{},[476],{"type":37,"value":477},"teams-strip-portals (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":480,"children":482},{"className":481},[],[483],{"type":37,"value":484},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-portals",{"type":37,"value":486}," + thread docs (",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":488,"children":490},{"className":489},[],[491],{"type":37,"value":492},"strip-portals-prompt.md",{"type":37,"value":181},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":495,"children":497},{"className":496},[],[498],{"type":37,"value":187},{"type":37,"value":500},", plus same-day retro backfills ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":502,"children":504},{"className":503},[],[505],{"type":37,"value":506},"strip-metrics-prompt.md",{"type":37,"value":223},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":509,"children":511},{"className":510},[],[512],{"type":37,"value":513},"strip-axis-prompt.md",{"type":37,"value":515},"). Thesis: a visual means the data it summarizes; a portal proves it — the honesty stance made interactive. Six-law portal grammar (a mark opens what it depicts · hover previews, click commits + writes URL · every aggregate carries its receipt, discrepancies printed not smoothed · negative space is data · descent stops at real data · Esc ascends one level). One composed interactive strip at 26-team scale: ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":517,"children":518},{},[519],{"type":37,"value":520},"Auto lens",{"type":37,"value":522}," (data picks each chip's metric; small-caps lens tags; named comparators, no z-scores — \"2.7× fleet median\", never σ; Risk precedence absolute; sticky selection; degenerates to baseline when nothing is notable; membership = the briefing + residual archive), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":524,"children":525},{},[526],{"type":37,"value":527},"focus gesture",{"type":37,"value":529}," (chip → people card with all five stats + stateful dots + \"+N idle\" door, siblings → quiet chips, focus = roster filter; per-team lens tabs cut), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":531,"children":532},{},[533],{"type":37,"value":534},"receipts",{"type":37,"value":536}," (addends re-add to the headline; the by_team-vs-rollup seam printed in amber — \"$4.02k attributed · $80 unresolved\"; estimated-formula popover; descent floor = sessions), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":538,"children":539},{},[540],{"type":37,"value":541},"return door",{"type":37,"value":543}," (bidirectional chip-dot ↔ roster-row hover highlight — \u002Fdocument-pattern candidate), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":545,"children":546},{},[547],{"type":37,"value":548},"residual chip",{"type":37,"value":550}," (\"21 teams · nothing notable · $5.4k\" — opens the tail, where the matrix belongs), whisper line (fixed-height hover preview — the demoted hover-panel). Lab rejects on-page: hover peephole, per-chip lens tabs, recursive in-chip decomposition, z-scores. Checkpoint strip question now three-way: lensed baseline vs people-cards vs composed portal.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":552,"children":553},{},[554,559,560,566,567,573,575,581],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":555,"children":556},{},[557],{"type":37,"value":558},"teams-strip-overdrive (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":561,"children":563},{"className":562},[],[564],{"type":37,"value":565},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-overdrive",{"type":37,"value":486},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":568,"children":570},{"className":569},[],[571],{"type":37,"value":572},"strip-overdrive-{prompt,plan}.md",{"type":37,"value":574},"). Deliberate overshoot study — \"how can we err too far in visual communication?\" Six graph-heavy treatments of the scale world in the c62 house grammar (dependency-free viewBox SVG, hash jitter, ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":576,"children":578},{"className":577},[],[579],{"type":37,"value":580},"\u003Ctitle>",{"type":37,"value":582}," on every mark, halo labels; palette = the c62-validated categorical order + attribution amber, re-run through the dataviz validator this session — ALL PASS), each with a filed crime report: helix wall (metaphor debt — c62's own verdict — + unreadable amplitude), colony (misjudged organic area, aesthetic scatter, decorative cilia), growth rings (fabricated age + radial distortion), loom (hairball — the beauty is the crossings, the crossings are the noise), barcode (the designed survivor: DNA as texture — 214 real fixture bars, length=spend\u002Fcolor=state, every bar a portal; tamed with min bar width), cockpit (the anti-page: 6 FABRICATED-stamped sparklines, rainbow gauge, dual-axis panel, 18 pulses, red-as-frame). Autopsy: six-error taxonomy (metaphor debt · unreadable channels · fabricated levels · aesthetic sorting · ink without a question · motion\u002Fstatus as decoration), each pinned to its guilty treatments. The line, located: expressiveness errs the moment a channel stops answering a question and starts decorating one. Survivor graduates: barcode row as the focus-card interior above ~12 people + a fleet-texture band candidate for the 214-person roster header.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":584,"children":585},{},[586,591,592,598,599,605,607,612,614,619,621,626,628,633,635,640,642,647],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":587,"children":588},{},[589],{"type":37,"value":590},"teams-strip-swarm (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":593,"children":595},{"className":594},[],[596],{"type":37,"value":597},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-swarm",{"type":37,"value":486},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":600,"children":602},{"className":601},[],[603],{"type":37,"value":604},"strip-swarm-{prompt,plan}.md",{"type":37,"value":606},"). Course correction from overdrive per Mark — no metaphors, the data-swarm-ideas grammar applied verbatim to the teams world: every mark maps to one datum, axes chosen so the swarm's shape is the answer, selective ring+halo annotations, legends above, ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":608,"children":610},{"className":609},[],[611],{"type":37,"value":580},{"type":37,"value":613}," everywhere (973 dots \u002F 971 tooltips). Four plots: ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":615,"children":616},{},[617],{"type":37,"value":618},"attribution swarm",{"type":37,"value":620}," (x=team, y=log spend\u002Fperson, color=state — Unassigned becomes an amber cloud of 61 people-shaped reasons), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":622,"children":623},{},[624],{"type":37,"value":625},"spend × presence audit field",{"type":37,"value":627}," (x=log spend, y=time-since-active with quadrant guides \"burning & present\"\u002F\"spent & gone\" — the amber mass drifting stale IS the mapping queue sorted by urgency; j.okafor ringed), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":629,"children":630},{},[631],{"type":37,"value":632},"shift swarm",{"type":37,"value":634}," (one dot = one session, x=hour, y=team, r=tokens, color=model — the ci-pool's overnight band drawn as \"pipeline hours — the alibi\": the mapping suggestion's evidence made visible; honest because sessions are the descent floor), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":636,"children":637},{},[638],{"type":37,"value":639},"leverage field",{"type":37,"value":641}," (x=sessions, y=tokens\u002Fsession, total-consumption isoquants — sprinters vs grinders, same bill, opposite styles; Core-Banking + tail folded to grey per the fixed-order rule). Coda: ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":643,"children":644},{},[645],{"type":37,"value":646},"the swarm chip",{"type":37,"value":648}," — the strip chip's bar slot replaced by a one-row micro-swarm of its people; at 61 identities the overlap converges to the barcode's texture — the two survivors are one idea at two densities. Checkpoint strip-interior candidates now: share bar \u002F barcode \u002F swarm row.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":650,"children":651},{},[652,657,658,664,665,671,673,678,680,685,687,692,694,699,701,706,708,713],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":653,"children":654},{},[655],{"type":37,"value":656},"teams-strip-bites (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":659,"children":661},{"className":660},[],[662],{"type":37,"value":663},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-bites",{"type":37,"value":486},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":666,"children":668},{"className":667},[],[669],{"type":37,"value":670},"strip-bites-{prompt,plan}.md",{"type":37,"value":672},"). The swarm chip generalized: the metric switcher is the cognitive axis and each lens gets the micro-visualization that best answers its question, decided by live bake-offs (2–3 candidate chip rows per lens, winner pilled, verdict grounded in the dataviz form heuristics). Winners: ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":674,"children":675},{},[676],{"type":37,"value":677},"Spend = micro-swarm",{"type":37,"value":679}," (donut is the skill's literal anti-example; bar repeats the sub-line; only the swarm adds shape + outliers), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":681,"children":682},{},[683],{"type":37,"value":684},"$\u002Fperson = dot-on-fleet-range",{"type":37,"value":686}," (the \"progress slider\" made honest — position-in-distribution with min\u002Fmedian\u002Fmax ticks, \"2.4× median\" drawn), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":688,"children":689},{},[690],{"type":37,"value":691},"Active = unit dots ≤12 with meter fallback",{"type":37,"value":693}," (people are countable; continuous fill fakes continuity at n=9; same density threshold as the focus card — one rule system-wide), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":695,"children":696},{},[697],{"type":37,"value":698},"Risk = severity glyphs",{"type":37,"value":700}," (findings are units not magnitudes; three squares answer one-person-or-systemic; heat cell re-introduces magnitude-by-color for a count), ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":702,"children":703},{},[704],{"type":37,"value":705},"Agents = micro-histogram",{"type":37,"value":707}," (the ratio hides its own question — same 2.3 mean, opposite cultures). Composed strip: UxTabGroup lens switcher, winning form follows the lens, every mark keeps ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":709,"children":711},{"className":710},[],[712],{"type":37,"value":580},{"type":37,"value":714},"; portals' Auto composes on top. Principles table (lens → question → form → what it reveals that the bar hid) + the law: a micro-viz earns the slot only if it answers the lens's question better than the number beside it. The pie's obituary published.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":716,"children":717},{},[718,723,724,730,731,737,739,744,746,751,753,758,760,765,767,772,774,778,780,785,787,792],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":719,"children":720},{},[721],{"type":37,"value":722},"teams-strip-levers (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":725,"children":727},{"className":726},[],[728],{"type":37,"value":729},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-levers",{"type":37,"value":486},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":732,"children":734},{"className":733},[],[735],{"type":37,"value":736},"strip-levers-{prompt,plan}.md",{"type":37,"value":738},"). The cognitive pass — states → levers. Lens test: (a) unambiguous good direction, (b) attribution to a real action, (c) sub-quarter feedback loop. Audit of the current five: Spend keeps (the one honest state — accountability ledger); $\u002Fperson → tooltip; Active-now → Auto lens + focus card (weather, but the only real-time signal); Agents\u002Fperson → focus card (diagnostic, no good direction); Risk upgraded to ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":740,"children":741},{},[742],{"type":37,"value":743},"Open, aged",{"type":37,"value":745}," (danger_level is already conditions-based and findings subsume those conditions with workflow + timestamps — age of oldest adds the missing lever: an SLA). Revised set, one per cognitive job: ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":747,"children":748},{},[749],{"type":37,"value":750},"Spend",{"type":37,"value":752}," (micro-swarm) · ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":754,"children":755},{},[756],{"type":37,"value":757},"Waste",{"type":37,"value":759}," — idle->14d spend, hollow unit dots, ✓ today · ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":761,"children":762},{},[763],{"type":37,"value":764},"Retention",{"type":37,"value":766}," — 7d cohort return, filled\u002Fhollow dots with meter fallback, ◐ via \u002Fapi\u002Fagents first_seen\u002Flast_active (NOT sessions — 200-row cap), explicitly not a dumbbell (one ratio isn't a trend) · ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":768,"children":769},{},[770],{"type":37,"value":771},"Coverage",{"type":37,"value":773}," — instrumented % of known machines, gap-emphasized meter, denominator honestly \"machines we can see\" (no MDM join) · ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":775,"children":776},{},[777],{"type":37,"value":743},{"type":37,"value":779}," — glyphs + oldest-age words, terminal statuses per the backend's own projection. Mapping coverage (the page's most movable lever) headlines the verdict line, not a lens. Candidate ledger with receipts: cache leverage + premium share → Cost Center (harness\u002Fworkload confounds; cost composition); Exposure-as-composed killed (2\u002F3 of its data doesn't exist; consumer keys are \u002Fidentity's per decision 3); egress surface → controls (per-agent counts double-count shared hosts; admin lever); guardrail posture → focus card (real lever via tool_calls decision_source). Thresholds anchored to data-max and printed in the whisper line. Follow-up (same day, per Mark): ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":781,"children":782},{},[783],{"type":37,"value":784},"Tokens added as a sixth lens",{"type":37,"value":786}," — Spend's native-unit twin (c66 principle: token counts are measured, dollars are estimated; same by_team rows, micro-swarm on a token scale; unit-toggle depth stays on Cost Center). Principle amended: one accountability ",{"type":32,"tag":159,"props":788,"children":789},{},[790],{"type":37,"value":791},"job",{"type":37,"value":793},", two units.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":795,"children":796},{},[797,802,803,809,810,816,818,823,825,831,833,839,840,846,848,854,856,862,863,869,871,877,879,884,886,891,893,898,900,905,907,912],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":798,"children":799},{},[800],{"type":37,"value":801},"teams-strip-horizons (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":804,"children":806},{"className":805},[],[807],{"type":37,"value":808},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-horizons",{"type":37,"value":486},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":811,"children":813},{"className":812},[],[814],{"type":37,"value":815},"strip-horizons-{prompt,plan}.md",{"type":37,"value":817},"). The expansion round — additional data, additional windows, less-defensible territory explored with every danger named. ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":819,"children":820},{},[821],{"type":37,"value":822},"Five schema discoveries",{"type":37,"value":824}," (amend the levers ledger): ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":826,"children":828},{"className":827},[],[829],{"type":37,"value":830},"file_access",{"type":37,"value":832}," with sensitivity categories is live; quota posture captured (",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":834,"children":836},{"className":835},[],[837],{"type":37,"value":838},"quota_5h\u002F7d",{"type":37,"value":223},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":841,"children":843},{"className":842},[],[844],{"type":37,"value":845},"overage_rejected",{"type":37,"value":847},"); ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":849,"children":851},{"className":850},[],[852],{"type":37,"value":853},"campaigns",{"type":37,"value":855}," has target\u002Fdirection\u002Fwindow\u002Fbaseline (runway ✓, was ◐); ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":857,"children":859},{"className":858},[],[860],{"type":37,"value":861},"attestations",{"type":37,"value":427},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":864,"children":866},{"className":865},[],[867],{"type":37,"value":868},"controls.packs",{"type":37,"value":870}," are literal maturity receipts; session shape rich (tool_kind, durations, exit codes, TLS flags, ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":872,"children":874},{"className":873},[],[875],{"type":37,"value":876},"proc:\u003Cpid>",{"type":37,"value":878}," uninstrumented-process markers). ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":880,"children":881},{},[882],{"type":37,"value":883},"21-window catalog",{"type":37,"value":885}," tiered ✓◐▲✗ with dangers (Goodhart\u002Fprivacy\u002Fcounterfactual\u002Fcomposite\u002Ffabrication) and personas — nine new windows incl. friction tax, sensitive-touch surface, shadow-process delta, secret dwell, blowout ledger, unattended autonomy (agent-framed), quota headroom, posture regression. ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":887,"children":888},{},[889],{"type":37,"value":890},"The drawn line:",{"type":37,"value":892}," prompt-topic mining — technically small (DLP already reads content), socially a cliff (protect-the-author vs characterize-them); declined; defensible cousin = practice profiles at repo grain. ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":894,"children":895},{},[896],{"type":37,"value":897},"Structural finding: growth is depth, not width",{"type":37,"value":899}," — the strip is full at six lenses; the windows pour into the focus card \u002F verdict line \u002F other pages, exactly as the portal grammar predicted. ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":901,"children":902},{},[903],{"type":37,"value":904},"Four graduates",{"type":37,"value":906}," (mocked): policy dividend + friction tax as one build (the pair is receipts, either alone is propaganda); spend runway vs campaign (labeled projection, verdict-line breach); fleet-hygiene block as Coverage's descent floor; new-joiner ramp (the positive-direction counterweight). Behavioral drift held for daily aggregates (200-row sessions cap would break the descent-floor law). ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":908,"children":909},{},[910],{"type":37,"value":911},"Capture roadmap",{"type":37,"value":913}," (6): daily per-identity aggregates (highest leverage), posture-change events, repo identity from cwd, read-only IdP pull (un-gates offboarding risk from SCIM — roadmap reorder), latest-version feed, session outcome reason.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":915,"children":916},{},[917,922,923,929,930,936,938,943,945,950,952,957,959,965,967,972,974,979,981,986],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":918,"children":919},{},[920],{"type":37,"value":921},"teams-strip-windows (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":282},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":924,"children":926},{"className":925},[],[927],{"type":37,"value":928},"\u002Fpages\u002Fteams-strip-windows",{"type":37,"value":486},{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":931,"children":933},{"className":932},[],[934],{"type":37,"value":935},"strip-windows-{prompt,plan}.md",{"type":37,"value":937},"). The horizons graduates built at full fidelity, each in its assigned home — depth behind existing marks, not new dashboards: ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":939,"children":940},{},[941],{"type":37,"value":942},"governance ledger",{"type":37,"value":944}," (dividend + friction as one two-sided block; 38 enforced \u002F 41 denied with the un-allowlisted MCP offender promoted to its one closing action; pair rule — neither panel renders alone; \"enforced,\" never \"prevented\"); ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":946,"children":947},{},[948],{"type":37,"value":949},"runway board",{"type":37,"value":951}," (per-campaign teams, solid spent \u002F dashed labeled projection \u002F ceiling tick, breach verdict line); ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":953,"children":954},{},[955],{"type":37,"value":956},"fleet-hygiene block",{"type":37,"value":958}," (Coverage's descent floor — named laptops, a ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":960,"children":962},{"className":961},[],[963],{"type":37,"value":964},"proc:",{"type":37,"value":966}," shadow process, version-lag and zombie rows each with a closing action; receipt re-adds to the chip's gap of 3, with non-counting hygiene rows explicitly separated); ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":968,"children":969},{},[970],{"type":37,"value":971},"ramp panel",{"type":37,"value":973}," (three joiner small-multiples vs team p25–p75 bands incl. the stalled case with \"check in →\"; days-to-band as the enablement number); ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":975,"children":976},{},[977],{"type":37,"value":978},"unattended autonomy",{"type":37,"value":980}," (verdict line + six overnight sessions, agent-framed with the 22:00–06:00 threshold printed); ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":982,"children":983},{},[984],{"type":37,"value":985},"secret-dwell and blowout receipt rows",{"type":37,"value":987}," (dwell-not-counterfactual; receipt-not-target). All ✓-tier windows only.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":989,"children":990},{},[991,996,998,1004,1006,1012,1014,1019],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":992,"children":993},{},[994],{"type":37,"value":995},"CORRECTION (2026-08-15):",{"type":37,"value":997}," The teams-strip-ideas\u002Fswarm-era claim \"per-team trends impossible — the daily series is fleet-wide\" is wrong as stated. ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":999,"children":1001},{"className":1000},[],[1002],{"type":37,"value":1003},"\u002Fapi\u002Fcosts",{"type":37,"value":1005}," applies ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":1007,"children":1009},{"className":1008},[],[1010],{"type":37,"value":1011},"?team=",{"type":37,"value":1013}," scoping ",{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":1015,"children":1016},{},[1017],{"type":37,"value":1018},"before",{"type":37,"value":1020}," its accumulation loop (web.rs ~2431–2625), so team-scoped totals (incl. cache_read_pct), by_model, and a per-team daily series are all reachable via N scoped fetches with zero backend work. The claim holds only for a single unscoped fetch. Design implications: per-team sparklines become buildable (portal law 5 no longer forbids them — the data exists); Cost Center's team table inherits cache\u002Fmodel split opportunities (c66 follow-on).",{"key":1022,"title":1023,"empty":18,"ast":1024},"extra","Decisions (Mark, 2026-08-14)",{"type":29,"children":1025},[1026],{"type":32,"tag":1027,"props":1028,"children":1029},"ol",{},[1030,1054,1064,1095],{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":1031,"children":1032},{},[1033,1038,1040,1046,1048,1053],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":1034,"children":1035},{},[1036],{"type":37,"value":1037},"Spend by Team",{"type":37,"value":1039}," — Cost Center is canonical; ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":1041,"children":1043},{"className":1042},[],[1044],{"type":37,"value":1045},"\u002Fteams",{"type":37,"value":1047}," keeps a slim team cost overview that cross-filters the roster and links to Cost Center's deeper team table. Single-sourced from ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":1049,"children":1051},{"className":1050},[],[1052],{"type":37,"value":50},{"type":37,"value":272},{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":1055,"children":1056},{},[1057,1062],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":1058,"children":1059},{},[1060],{"type":37,"value":1061},"Team management",{"type":37,"value":1063}," — the mapping workspace (c61 concept 3) becomes the designed pre-SCIM write path (unassigned queue, evidence, suggestions, bulk assign, autocomplete). SCIM-day members\u002Froles stays projected.",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":1065,"children":1066},{},[1067,1072,1074,1079,1081,1086,1088,1093],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":1068,"children":1069},{},[1070],{"type":37,"value":1071},"Credentials",{"type":37,"value":1073}," — relocate the \"Agent credentials & access\" section to ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":1075,"children":1077},{"className":1076},[],[1078],{"type":37,"value":58},{"type":37,"value":1080},"; explore how ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":1082,"children":1084},{"className":1083},[],[1085],{"type":37,"value":1045},{"type":37,"value":1087}," communicates the high-level gist (compact per-user identity-source\u002Frisk indicator linking into ",{"type":32,"tag":45,"props":1089,"children":1091},{"className":1090},[],[1092],{"type":37,"value":58},{"type":37,"value":1094},").",{"type":32,"tag":98,"props":1096,"children":1097},{},[1098,1103],{"type":32,"tag":88,"props":1099,"children":1100},{},[1101],{"type":37,"value":1102},"Ship scope",{"type":37,"value":1104}," — mocks first, checkpoint before any qdash\u002Fbackend work.",[1106,1108,1112,1116,1120,1122,1126,1129,1133],{"name":1107,"prompt":513,"plan":4},"strip-axis",{"name":1109,"prompt":1110,"plan":1111},"strip-bites","strip-bites-prompt.md","strip-bites-plan.md",{"name":1113,"prompt":1114,"plan":1115},"strip-horizons","strip-horizons-prompt.md","strip-horizons-plan.md",{"name":1117,"prompt":1118,"plan":1119},"strip-levers","strip-levers-prompt.md","strip-levers-plan.md",{"name":1121,"prompt":506,"plan":4},"strip-metrics",{"name":1123,"prompt":1124,"plan":1125},"strip-overdrive","strip-overdrive-prompt.md","strip-overdrive-plan.md",{"name":1127,"prompt":492,"plan":1128},"strip-portals","strip-portals-plan.md",{"name":1130,"prompt":1131,"plan":1132},"strip-swarm","strip-swarm-prompt.md","strip-swarm-plan.md",{"name":1134,"prompt":1135,"plan":1136},"strip-windows","strip-windows-prompt.md","strip-windows-plan.md",[263],[1139,1143,1147,1151,1155,1159,1163,1167,1171,1175,1179,1183,1187,1191,1194,1198,1201,1205,1208,1211,1214,1217,1220,1223,1226,1229,1232,1235,1238,1241,1244,1247],{"src":19,"kind":1140,"order":1141,"caption":1142},"hero",19,"c67 composition bake-off — Stack A (accountable roster) vs Stack B (teams first), both with the c67 decisions applied, plus the verdict",{"src":1144,"kind":1140,"order":1145,"caption":1146},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v3.png",20,"c67 mapping workspace form factors — inline band, slide-over drawer, \u002Fteams\u002Fmapping sub-route — plus three identity-gist depths and the trade-off verdict",{"src":1148,"kind":1140,"order":1149,"caption":1150},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v4.png",21,"c67 ship candidate — Stack A spine with v3 verdicts in the shipped-integrations idiom, plus the calls made (adoption folded, filter-in-place drill-down) and the checkpoint agenda",{"src":1152,"kind":1140,"order":1153,"caption":1154},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v5.png",22,"c67 states & scale — first-run, all-clear, attention at 14 (expand row designed) and at 214 people, verdict line, amber = attribution debt only, userRollups()-shaped fixtures",{"src":1156,"kind":1140,"order":1157,"caption":1158},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v6.png",23,"c67 state machine + component map — v5's four states as one live-switchable template, section × state matrix, assign\u002Fmapped\u002Fattributed vocabulary, layer audit with three confirmed gaps and the extraction shortlist",{"src":1160,"kind":1140,"order":1161,"caption":1162},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v7.png",24,"c67 on real components — the four states with the roster on the layer DataTable (#details expand, column search, limit\u002Ffooter), UxAvatar\u002FUxPill\u002FUxCode\u002FUxTag throughout, v6's Teams chip row cherry-picked whole",{"src":1164,"kind":1140,"order":1165,"caption":1166},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-ideas.png",25,"c67 strip lens exploration — full metric catalog, a live UxTabGroup switcher (Spend · $\u002Fperson · Active · Risk · Agents) over two strips with lens-driven sort and top-5 re-ranking, four bar semantics (share\u002Fscaled\u002Fmeter\u002Fnone)",{"src":1168,"kind":1140,"order":1169,"caption":1170},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-axis.png",26,"c67 simplicity ↔ expressiveness study — nine live treatments from headline (−4) through quiet chips, ticker, one-bar to stat chips, fingerprints, people cards, and the matrix (+4), with the lensed baseline at 0 and the verdict",{"src":1172,"kind":1140,"order":1173,"caption":1174},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-portals.png",27,"c67 portal study — the composed strip: Auto lens with why-tags and named comparators, focus gesture (chip → people card, siblings → quiet), receipts with the printed seam, bidirectional chip↔roster highlight, residual chip; six-law portal grammar",{"src":1176,"kind":1140,"order":1177,"caption":1178},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-overdrive.png",28,"c67 deliberate-overshoot study — helix wall, colony, growth rings, loom, barcode, cockpit, each with a filed crime report; six-error autopsy; survivor: the barcode (DNA as texture, every bar a portal)",{"src":1180,"kind":1140,"order":1181,"caption":1182},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-swarm.png",29,"c67 swarm pass in the data-swarm grammar — attribution swarm, spend × presence audit field, session shift swarm (the ci-pool's alibi drawn), leverage field with isoquants; coda: the swarm chip, every dot a person",{"src":1184,"kind":1140,"order":1185,"caption":1186},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-bites.png",30,"c67 micro-viz bake-offs — each lens gets its best bite-sized form (spend=micro-swarm, $\u002Fperson=dot-on-range, active=unit dots, risk=severity glyphs, agents=micro-histogram), plus the composed lens-switching strip and the pie's obituary",{"src":1188,"kind":1140,"order":1189,"caption":1190},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-levers.png",31,"c67 cognitive pass — states → levers: the current five audited (three demoted, Risk upgraded to Open-aged), a receipts-backed candidate ledger, and the revised lever strip live (Spend · Tokens · Waste · Retention · Coverage · Open) with mapping coverage in the verdict line",{"src":1192,"kind":1140,"order":20,"caption":1193},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-horizons.png","c67 expansion round — five schema discoveries, the 21-window insight catalog (tiered ✓◐▲✗ with named dangers and personas), the drawn line on prompt-topic mining, the depth-not-width finding, four graduates with mockups, and the six-item capture roadmap",{"src":1195,"kind":1140,"order":1196,"caption":1197},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-windows.png",33,"c67 horizons built — governance ledger (dividend & friction paired), runway board with labeled projections, fleet-hygiene block cross-footed to the Coverage gap, ramp panel with a stalled joiner, agent-framed unattended-autonomy list, secret-dwell and blowout receipt rows",{"src":1199,"kind":1140,"order":1200},"\u002Farchive\u002F2026-q3\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v8.png",4999,{"src":1202,"kind":1203,"order":1204},"\u002Farchive\u002F2026-q3\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v8-full.png","full",9000,{"src":1206,"kind":1203,"order":1207},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v2-full.png",9019,{"src":1209,"kind":1203,"order":1210},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v3-full.png",9020,{"src":1212,"kind":1203,"order":1213},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v4-full.png",9021,{"src":1215,"kind":1203,"order":1216},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v5-full.png",9022,{"src":1218,"kind":1203,"order":1219},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v6-full.png",9023,{"src":1221,"kind":1203,"order":1222},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-ideas-v7-full.png",9024,{"src":1224,"kind":1203,"order":1225},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-ideas-full.png",9025,{"src":1227,"kind":1203,"order":1228},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-axis-full.png",9026,{"src":1230,"kind":1203,"order":1231},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-portals-full.png",9027,{"src":1233,"kind":1203,"order":1234},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-overdrive-full.png",9028,{"src":1236,"kind":1203,"order":1237},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-swarm-full.png",9029,{"src":1239,"kind":1203,"order":1240},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-bites-full.png",9030,{"src":1242,"kind":1203,"order":1243},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-levers-full.png",9031,{"src":1245,"kind":1203,"order":1246},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-horizons-full.png",9032,{"src":1248,"kind":1203,"order":1249},"\u002Fcycles\u002Fdesign\u002Fc67-teams-strip-windows-full.png",9033,[1251],{"path":1252,"title":1253,"image":1199,"gallery":1254},"archive\u002F2026-q3\u002F2026-08-15-c67-teams-ideas-v8","Teams Ideas v8",[1255,1257],{"src":1199,"alt":1256},"Teams ideas v8 — the composed risk-story roster direction.",{"src":1202,"alt":1258},"Teams Ideas v8 — full page, all four states",[1260,1261,1262,1263,1264,1265,1266,1267,1268,1269,1270,1271,1272,1273,1274],{"route":288,"href":288},{"route":305,"href":305},{"route":330,"href":330},{"route":374,"href":374},{"route":391,"href":391},{"route":408,"href":408},{"route":467,"href":467},{"route":663,"href":663},{"route":808,"href":808},{"route":450,"href":450},{"route":729,"href":729},{"route":565,"href":565},{"route":484,"href":484},{"route":597,"href":597},{"route":928,"href":928},1789151073906]