[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":51},["ShallowReactive",2],{"cycle-doc-design-c136-initial-prompt.md":3},{"cycle":4,"project":7,"path":10,"title":11,"toc":12,"ast":13},{"id":5,"title":6},"c136","Mechanic Access",{"id":8,"label":9},"design","Design","initial-prompt.md","c136. Mechanic Access",[],{"type":14,"children":15},"root",[16,24,33,46],{"type":17,"tag":18,"props":19,"children":20},"element","p",{},[21],{"type":22,"value":23},"text","From the c130 decisions walk with Mark, 2026-11-09, ruling on c130 D6 (Data). His words:",{"type":17,"tag":25,"props":26,"children":27},"blockquote",{},[28],{"type":17,"tag":18,"props":29,"children":30},{},[31],{"type":22,"value":32},"Three Sources is correct, even if we fold in plane later. We need the ability to point to a base url where we find a plane. That connection layer will need standardized credentials. It's incredibly useful to point to a running plane data thingy (what's this called?). I also like planning now for giving out mechanic access. I opened this access to Qpoint for three days while they fixed this documented problem or implemented this new feature, or hot-fixed this issue. I suppose we also need to specify these categories now so that build partners feel comfortable granting a documented level of access to their running data plane.",{"type":17,"tag":18,"props":34,"children":35},{},[36,38,44],{"type":22,"value":37},"Asked where mechanic access is specified and built, Mark chose: ",{"type":17,"tag":39,"props":40,"children":41},"strong",{},[42],{"type":22,"value":43},"its own cycle at stage 1",{"type":22,"value":45},".",{"type":17,"tag":18,"props":47,"children":48},{},[49],{"type":22,"value":50},"Create a plan, ask any clarifying questions, suggest patterns I may not be considering.",1794599397799]