c10 Benchmark Rubric

Use this rubric to score c9 overview candidates against tmp/security-dashboard-global-overview-research.md.

Scale

Score each category from 1 to 5.

• 1 = missing or actively weak
• 2 = present only in fragments
• 3 = useful but incomplete
• 4 = strong and mostly aligned
• 5 = exemplary for the benchmark

For every score, record:

• the numeric score
• one sentence describing the strongest behavior
• one sentence describing the most important gap

Categories

1. Posture Clarity

Does the page communicate overall security state quickly and in plain language?

2. Priority / What Matters Now

Does the page clearly surface the most urgent or important concerns first?

3. Concentration / Where Risk Is Clustered

Does the page show where risk is concentrated across assets, identities, repos, endpoints, accounts, or boundaries?

4. Trend Or Change Visibility

Does the page show movement over time, novelty, or meaningful change since the last scan?

5. Coverage / Trustworthiness Visibility

Does the page explain coverage gaps, confidence limits, or why the reader should trust or question the current picture?

6. Explanation Quality

Does the page explain why a concern matters instead of only naming it?

7. Drilldown Clarity

Does the page make the next investigative click obvious and concrete?

8. Above-The-Fold Visual Economy

Does the page use above-the-fold space efficiently without turning the first screen into an equal-weight wall of cards?

Decision Rule

• Score only the primary c9 overview artifacts: home, security, and inventory.
• Review the wireframe and matching brief together.
• Treat secondary artifacts only as pattern sources, never as overview candidates.
• Select winners by section, not by whole page.